Tuesday 17 June 2014

A Rapid Blood Test to Diagnose Sepsis could be on the way

17 th OCTOBER 2013
Rapid blood test to diagnose sepsis at the bedside could save thousands of lives, study suggests

Edited (by me) PLOSone Press release
Researchers at King’s College London have identified a biomarker – a biological ‘fingerprint’ – for sepsis in the blood, and showed it could be possible to diagnose the condition within two hours by screening for this biomarker at a patient’s bedside. Sepsis (sometimes referred to as ‘blood poisoning’) is a life-threatening condition that arises when the body’s inflammatory response to a bacterial infection injures its own tissues and organs. Costing the NHS over £2billion annually, the condition kills more people than breast and bowel cancer combined (approximately 37,000 a year). Rapid diagnosis and treatment with antibiotics saves lives, but as there are currently no biomarkers in clinical use to enable fast diagnosis, it can take up to two days to analyse samples in the laboratory. 

Published on the 16th October 2013 in the journal PLOS ONE and funded by both Guy’s and St Thomas’ Charity and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London, this study highlights a possible biomarker for the rapid diagnosis of sepsis. The work was performed in collaboration with Cepheid, developer of the GeneXpert, which is capable of performing rapid molecular detection.
Researchers at King’s and Cepheid, a molecular diagnostics company, took samples of blood from three groups of patients; those with sepsis, patients with other Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (that does not respond to antibiotics), and healthy patients. From the blood samples they were able to amplify small amounts of RNA into large quantities to see which particular microRNAs were increased. By using this method, the team found that a certain group of microRNAs were more active in the sepsis patients than in the other groups, highlighting a potential biomarker for the condition.
The study was replicated with a large group of Swedish patients with severe sepsis, which validated the results. By using this method of screening and analysing the blood in both studies, the researchers were able to diagnose sepsis within two hours, with 86% accuracy.
Symptoms of sepsis are similar to other types of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), yet only sepsis responds to antibiotics. It is therefore important for clinicians to be able to distinguish sepsis from other types of SIRS as administering antibiotics in non-sepsis cases can add pressure to the development of antibiotic resistance. Professor Lord said: “Not only would an accurate diagnostic test improve outcomes for patients, but it would contribute to tackling the ongoing problem of antibiotic resistance by allowing clinicians to distinguish between SIRS and sepsis and diagnose these severe conditions more accurately.”
Plans for a randomised clinical trial are underway at King’s College London and Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, part of King’s Health Partners Academic Health Sciences Centre.

My Response and take on the Story
This work is potentially quite exciting as the rapid diagnosis of fast moving diseases such as sepsis is of great importance. In medicine, an early intervention in these cases can often result in a much improved result for the patient. With this in mind, any improvements or aids to the diagnosis of such diseases are to be welcomed, especially when the tests are rapid and potentially able to be of use at the point of care. The results reported in the paper are very encouraging in that a reliable discrimination between sepsis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome can be achieved, which in turn can help point clinicians towards the most appropriate treatments to administer. Further studies will be required to increase patient numbers sampled and so that the full potential of this
test can be realised.

Professor Mark Fielder, Medical Microbiologist, Kingston University
London.

No comments:

Post a Comment